Young v. Bitcon was tried to jury verdict in Placer County. The plaintiff claimed that Jim’s client was negligent for failing to observe him while he was riding his bicycle in the bike lane. Jim contended that the plaintiff was riding his bicycle against traffic at an excessive speed and therefore the accident was completely the plaintiff’s fault. As a result of the impact between Jim’s client’s car and the plaintiff, the plaintiff sustained fractured ribs, a wrist fracture, and low back pain. After a three-day trial the jury deliberated for thirty minutes and returned a defense verdict in Jim’s client’s favor. The jury found the plaintiff 100% at fault for the accident. The defendant had offered the plaintiff $5,001 in a 998 three months before the trial. The plaintiff did not accept the 998 offer within the statutory period. The offer was never made again and the only offer at the time of trial was a waiver of costs. Since Jim’s client was the prevailing party at the trial, the insurer was awarded over $3,000 in costs.
Serving clients in civil litigation since 2003.
Young v. Bitcon – Placer County
On Behalf of Powers Miller Attorneys at Law | Sep 1, 2005 | Results
Recent Posts
- When is a business potentially liable for a slip-and-fall incident?
- Jim Miller and Taylor Turville Recognized by Northern California Super Lawyers
- Why investigate UM/UIM claims before settling?
- 3 ways homeowners can reduce their overall premises liability risks
- Why guests may fraudulently claim to get hurt at someone’s house
Archives
- October 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- April 2024
- January 2024
- October 2023
- July 2023
- April 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- October 2022
- July 2022
- April 2022
- January 2022
- October 2021
- August 2021
- November 2020
- August 2020
- March 2020
- January 2020
- October 2019
- July 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- April 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- July 2017
- May 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- February 2016
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- November 2014
- October 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- December 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- October 2012
- September 2012
- July 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- December 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- April 2011
- January 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- July 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- January 2010
- September 2009
- May 2008
- March 2008
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- June 2006
- September 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- November 2004
- July 2004
- April 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- December 2002
Categories
- Firm News (8)
- Homeowner defense (1)
- Insurance defense (5)
- Legal News (12)
- Personal injury defense (5)
- Premises liability defense (6)
- Results (69)